Detailed Case Information - RP24-0011

Case Description: RP24-0011 - STATE VS. TODD JULIUS HEISKANEN (RP)

Filing Date: 08/05/2024

Case Type: RP - PRISON RE-ENTRY PROGRAM

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge STEINHEIMER, CONNIE J.
2 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
3 DA - District Attorney Lucia, Esq., Austin
4 DEFT - Defendant HEISKANEN (TN), TODD JULIUS
5 APD - Alternate Public Defender Chavez, Esq., Wendy

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 10/29/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
- filed on:
2. 10/22/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 10/22/2024
3. 10/15/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 10/15/2024
4. 10/08/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 10/08/2024
5. 10/01/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 10/01/2024
6. 09/24/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 09/24/2024
7. 09/17/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 09/17/2024
8. 09/10/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 09/10/2024
9. 09/03/2024 at 4:30 PM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H276 - SC-FIRST APPEARANCE
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 09/03/2024

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/07/2024
2. 3130 - Ord Acceptance Drug Court 08/07/2024
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.